GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon 9500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1451not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.52no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameR300GK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data960
Core clock speed275 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors110 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10087.84
ROPs424
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 150 Watt

ATI 9500 has 1150% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9500 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9500
Radeon 9500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 89 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.