GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1555	137
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Power efficiency	no data	51.29
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	RV280	AD107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2003 (22 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2560
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1755 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	140.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	4	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	166 MHz	16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	2.656 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	96
1440p	no data	50
4K	no data	30

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 March 2003	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	50 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---