GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs Radeon 890M

Place in the ranking	261	17
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	100.00	53.41
Architecture	RDNA 3.5 (2024)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	Strix Point	GB203
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)	2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	10496
Core clock speed	400 MHz	990 MHz
Boost clock speed	2900 MHz	1515 MHz
Number of transistors	34,000 million	45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	95 Watt
Texture fill rate	185.6	496.9
Floating-point processing power	5.939 TFLOPS	31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	128
TMUs	64	328
Tensor Cores	no data	328
Ray Tracing Cores	16	82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	24 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	811.5 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	-	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 890M 21.55

RTX 5090 Mobile 72.89
+238%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 890M 8361

RTX 5090 Mobile 28280
+238%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−218%

140−150
+218%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

48
−233%

160−170

+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −238%	230−240 +238%
Counter-Strike 2	38 −216%	120−130 +216%
Forza Horizon 4	76 −229%	250−260 +229%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −228%	190−200 +228%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −228%	190−200 +228%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −227%	160−170 +227%
Valorant	85−90 −230%	290−300 +230%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −238%	230−240 +238%
Counter-Strike 2	30 −233%	100−105 +233%
Dota 2	55 −227%	180−190 +227%
Far Cry 5	49 −227%	160−170 +227%
Fortnite	110−120 −210%	350−400 +210%
Forza Horizon 4	64 −228%	210−220 +228%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −228%	190−200 +228%
Grand Theft Auto V	55 −227%	180−190 +227%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −228%	190−200 +228%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −215%	450−500 +215%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −227%	160−170 +227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −233%	230−240 +233%
Valorant	85−90 −230%	290−300 +230%
World of Tanks	240−250 −231%	800−850 +231%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −238%	230−240 +238%
Counter-Strike 2	26 −227%	85−90 +227%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −229%	230−240 +229%
Forza Horizon 4	55 −227%	180−190 +227%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −228%	190−200 +228%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −215%	450−500 +215%
Valorant	85−90 −230%	290−300 +230%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −233%	80−85 +233%
Dota 2	35−40 −214%	110−120 +214%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −233%	120−130 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
World of Tanks	140−150 −208%	450−500 +208%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −218%	140−150 +218%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −233%	200−210 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −233%	190−200 +233%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −214%	110−120 +214%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −220%	160−170 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −223%	100−105 +223%
Valorant	55−60 −233%	190−200 +233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Dota 2	35−40 −224%	120−130 +224%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −224%	120−130 +224%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −224%	55−60 +224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −233%	220−230 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −221%	45−50 +221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −224%	120−130 +224%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −218%	70−75 +218%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −221%	90−95 +221%
Fortnite	24−27 −227%	85−90 +227%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −233%	110−120 +233%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Valorant	27−30 −233%	90−95 +233%