Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI 8500 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameR250Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2002 (22 years ago)4 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed300 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors60 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400633.6
Floating-point processing powerno data20.28 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2002 4 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 300 Watt

ATI 8500 XT has 1100% lower power consumption.

Pro V620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 XT and Radeon Pro V620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8500 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500 XT
Radeon 8500 XT
AMD Radeon Pro V620
Radeon Pro V620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.