Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs ATI 8500 X4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR200Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed250 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors60 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)92 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000291.4
Floating-point performanceno data9.326 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 3.0 x16
Length330 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 92 Watt 120 Watt

ATI 8500 X4 has 30.4% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 X4 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8500 X4 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500 X4
Radeon 8500 X4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.