Radeon R5 A335 vs 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking518not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameKrackan PointExo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)21 October 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256320
Core clock speed400 MHz1070 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data690 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate46.4021.40
Floating-point processing power1.4848 TFLOPS0.6848 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1620
Ray Tracing Cores4no data
L0 Cache64 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KB80 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.41.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm

Radeon 840M has a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 840M and Radeon R5 A335. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5 A335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or Radeon R5 A335, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.