Radeon R5 A320 vs 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.73no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameStrix HaloJet
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560320
Core clock speed1295 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate464.016.50
Floating-point processing power14.85 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs16020
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L2 Cache8 MBno data
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm

Radeon 8060S has a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8060S and Radeon R5 A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 A320 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 186 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Radeon R5 A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.