RTX PRO 6000 vs Radeon 780M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking318not rated
Place by popularity64not in top-100
Power efficiency83.15no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameHawx PointGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76824064
Core clock speed800 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate129.61,810
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs48752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Cores12188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1771 vote

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 780M or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.