Jetson Nano vs Radeon 780M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking297not rated
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Power efficiency84.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePhoenixGM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed800 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz921 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate129.614.74
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS0.2358 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4816
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x4
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 400% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a desktop card while Jetson Nano is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1444 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.