Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB vs Radeon 760M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency69.68no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code namePhoenixGV10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed800 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz1377 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million9,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate83.1744.06
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS1.41 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data136.5 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a desktop card while Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 157 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.