Arc B580 vs Radeon 760M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 760M with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 760M
2023
15 Watt
12.67

Arc B580 outperforms 760M by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking373116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.27
Power efficiency66.9814.48
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameHawx PointBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed800 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17427.2
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Cores820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data456.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 760M 12.67
Arc B580 34.75
+174%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5663
Arc B580 15525
+174%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
−317%
125
+317%
1440p18
−278%
68
+278%
4K14−16
−200%
42
+200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.99
1440pno data3.66
4Kno data5.93

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 105
−102%
210−220
+102%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−273%
112
+273%
Hogwarts Legacy 26
−415%
134
+415%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−115%
120−130
+115%
Counter-Strike 2 77
−175%
210−220
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−304%
97
+304%
Far Cry 5 38
−355%
173
+355%
Fortnite 75−80
−106%
160−170
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−148%
140−150
+148%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−339%
193
+339%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
−405%
101
+405%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−196%
140−150
+196%
Valorant 110−120
−89.7%
220−230
+89.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−115%
120−130
+115%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−542%
210−220
+542%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−47.9%
270−280
+47.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−356%
82
+356%
Dota 2 85−90
−170%
240−250
+170%
Far Cry 5 35
−357%
160
+357%
Fortnite 75−80
−106%
160−170
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−148%
140−150
+148%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−295%
174
+295%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−300%
140
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
−440%
81
+440%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−279%
106
+279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−196%
140−150
+196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−556%
236
+556%
Valorant 110−120
−89.7%
220−230
+89.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−115%
120−130
+115%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−166%
77
+166%
Dota 2 85−90
−170%
240−250
+170%
Far Cry 5 33
−352%
149
+352%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−148%
140−150
+148%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−176%
69
+176%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−196%
140−150
+196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−270%
85
+270%
Valorant 110−120
−89.7%
220−230
+89.7%
Fortnite 75−80
−106%
160−170
+106%
Counter-Strike 2 16
−500%
95−100
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−150%
250−260
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−214%
69
+214%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−265%
62
+265%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−37.8%
170−180
+37.8%
Valorant 140−150
−75%
250−260
+75%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−153%
95−100
+153%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−367%
56
+367%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−279%
110
+279%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−212%
100−110
+212%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−260%
54
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−240%
68
+240%
Fortnite 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−389%
40−45
+389%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−200%
78
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−360%
46
+360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−367%
84
+367%
Valorant 75−80
−203%
220−230
+203%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−211%
55−60
+211%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−389%
40−45
+389%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30
+500%
Dota 2 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−321%
59
+321%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−300%
32
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Fortnite 12−14
−269%
45−50
+269%

This is how Radeon 760M and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 317% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 278% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 556% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc B580 surpassed Radeon 760M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.67 34.75
Recency 6 December 2023 16 January 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 190 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1166.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 174.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1
259 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
560 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.