GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs ATI Radeon 7200

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.14
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameR100GA103S
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)25 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed166 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1260 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate1292.3
Floating-point processing powerno data18.71 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs6232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 7200 2
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19516
+975700%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data141
1440pno data88
4Kno data59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 109
+0%
109
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 89
+0%
89
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Dota 2 151
+0%
151
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+0%
101
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 61
+0%
61
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 347
+0%
347
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 25 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 115 Watt

ATI 7200 has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 year, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 313 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7200 or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.