Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs 660M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking568not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.87no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1500 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2690 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60344.3
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS22.04 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24128
Ray Tracing Cores632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 165 Watt

Radeon 660M has 312.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and Radeon RX 7650 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 345 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.