Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU vs Radeon 660M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking329not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.19no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameRembrandt+no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38438
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60no data
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 53 Watt

Radeon 660M has 32.5% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a desktop card while Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 305 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 198 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.