Radeon 660M vs 630

Place in the ranking	703	561
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.41	11.86
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	384
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.98	45.60
Floating-point processing power	1.247 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	24
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.93

Radeon 660M 6.89
+75.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1512

Radeon 660M 2647
+75.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

12−14

−100%

24
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −200%	24 +200%
Elden Ring	9−10 −144%	22 +144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −100%	21−24 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −25%	10 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −147%	42 +147%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −300%	32 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
Valorant	6−7 −500%	36 +500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −100%	21−24 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7 −14.3%
Dota 2	12−14 −192%	35 +192%
Elden Ring	9−10 −144%	22 +144%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −45%	29 +45%
Fortnite	21−24 −78.3%	40−45 +78.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −94.1%	33 +94.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −108%	25 +108%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −64.7%	55−60 +64.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Valorant	6−7 −217%	19 +217%
World of Tanks	65−70 −59.7%	100−110 +59.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −100%	21−24 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Dota 2	12−14 −300%	48 +300%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −64.7%	28 +64.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −64.7%	55−60 +64.7%
Valorant	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Elden Ring	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −40.7%	35−40 +40.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
World of Tanks	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Metro Exodus	0−1	10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Valorant	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Elden Ring	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −81.8%	20−22 +81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Fortnite	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Valorant	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how Radeon 630 and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

Radeon 660M is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 630 is 14% faster.
in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 660M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 630 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Radeon 660M is ahead in 57 tests (92%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.93	6.89
Recency	13 May 2019	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt

Radeon 660M has a 75.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.