GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs Radeon 610M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking784not rated
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Power efficiency13.21no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameDragon RangeG98B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1288
Core clock speed400 MHz529 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate17.602.116
Floating-point processing power0.5632 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
Ray Tracing Cores2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared702 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.23 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 5 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

Radeon 610M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

9200M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 610M and GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 610M is a desktop card while GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 722 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.