HD Graphics vs Radeon 530

Place in the ranking	824	1164
Place by popularity	not in top-100	68
Power efficiency	3.67	1.53
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code name	Weston	Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	1 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	48
Core clock speed	730 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	6.300
Floating-point processing power	0.7864 TFLOPS	0.1008 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	1
TMUs	24	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 530 2.30
+243%

HD Graphics 0.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 530 1028
+244%

HD Graphics 299

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 530 1542
+414%

HD Graphics 300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

16
+300%

4−5

−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	10 +400%	2−3 −400%
Fortnite	30 +275%	8−9 −275%
Forza Horizon 4	20 +300%	5−6 −300%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Valorant	40−45 +258%	12−14 −258%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	13 +333%	3−4 −333%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	36 +260%	10−11 −260%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	30 +275%	8−9 −275%
Far Cry 5	10 +400%	2−3 −400%
Fortnite	13 +333%	3−4 −333%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	12 +300%	3−4 −300%
Metro Exodus	4 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 +267%	3−4 −267%
Valorant	40−45 +258%	12−14 −258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	28 +250%	8−9 −250%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Valorant	40−45 +258%	12−14 −258%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

12−14

+300%

3−4
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Valorant	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%