Radeon RX 7600M XT vs RTX A5500 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A5500 Mobile with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX A5500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
44.96
+31.6%

RTX A5500 Mobile outperforms RX 7600M XT by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking77151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.9519.80
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA103Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74242048
Core clock speed975 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors22,000 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate348.0316.0
Floating-point processing power22.27 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs232128
Tensor Cores232no data
Ray Tracing Cores5832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A5500 Mobile 44.96
+31.6%
RX 7600M XT 34.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A5500 Mobile 17350
+31.6%
RX 7600M XT 13184

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A5500 Mobile 35376
RX 7600M XT 37202
+5.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A5500 Mobile 26260
RX 7600M XT 28271
+7.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A5500 Mobile 104565
RX 7600M XT 152903
+46.2%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX A5500 Mobile 9568
+0.4%
RX 7600M XT 9527

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX A5500 Mobile 162
RX 7600M XT 202
+24.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX A5500 Mobile 194
RX 7600M XT 218
+12.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX A5500 Mobile 215
+15.4%
RX 7600M XT 186

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX A5500 Mobile 210
RX 7600M XT 230
+9.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX A5500 Mobile 174
+100%
RX 7600M XT 87

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX A5500 Mobile 91
RX 7600M XT 112
+23.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX A5500 Mobile 135
+14.3%
RX 7600M XT 119

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX A5500 Mobile 18
RX 7600M XT 25
+37.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD127
+5.8%
120
−5.8%
1440p76
+18.8%
64
−18.8%
4K52
+48.6%
35
−48.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 129
+153%
50−55
−153%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−56%
131
+56%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−104%
139
+104%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+30.6%
95−100
−30.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+29%
60−65
−29%
Cyberpunk 2077 114
+124%
50−55
−124%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+26.5%
65−70
−26.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+27.3%
75−80
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+16.4%
160−170
−16.4%
Hitman 3 85−90
+34.9%
60−65
−34.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−13.4%
144
+13.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+21.1%
75−80
−21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+38.1%
100−110
−38.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+13.2%
110−120
−13.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−182%
237
+182%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−67.6%
114
+67.6%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+30.6%
95−100
−30.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+29%
60−65
−29%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+72.5%
50−55
−72.5%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+26.5%
65−70
−26.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+27.3%
75−80
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+16.4%
160−170
−16.4%
Hitman 3 85−90
+34.9%
60−65
−34.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−11.8%
142
+11.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+21.1%
75−80
−21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200
−4%
208
+4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+28.1%
60−65
−28.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+13.2%
110−120
−13.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−1.2%
85
+1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−35.3%
92
+35.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+29%
60−65
−29%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+49%
50−55
−49%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+26.5%
65−70
−26.5%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6.7%
180
−6.7%
Hitman 3 85−90
+34.9%
60−65
−34.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+17.9%
140
−17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 178
−1.1%
180
+1.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+2%
100
−2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 77
+28.3%
60
−28.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+21.1%
75−80
−21.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+33.3%
55−60
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+32.6%
45−50
−32.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−44.2%
62
+44.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−52.3%
67
+52.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+27.6%
170−180
−27.6%
Hitman 3 50−55
+37.8%
35−40
−37.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−23.3%
106
+23.3%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−24.3%
92
+24.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+7.5%
120
−7.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−27.6%
74
+27.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+19.1%
160−170
−19.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+33.3%
50−55
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+21.2%
150−160
−21.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−94.1%
99
+94.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+21.2%
52
−21.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−18.5%
32
+18.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−20%
30
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+125%
8−9
−125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−63.6%
90
+63.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+6.3%
64
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+36.4%
22
−36.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

This is how RTX A5500 Mobile and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5500 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5500 Mobile is 19% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5500 Mobile is 49% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A5500 Mobile is 153% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 182% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A5500 Mobile is ahead in 53 tests (74%)
  • RX 7600M XT is ahead in 19 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.96 34.17
Recency 22 March 2022 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 120 Watt

RTX A5500 Mobile has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 37.5% lower power consumption.

The RTX A5500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 14 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.