Arc A310 vs RTX A500 Embedded

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.14
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA107SDG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed435 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate85.4464.00
Floating-point processing power5.468 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432
Tensor Cores6496
Ray Tracing Cores166

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

RTX A500 Embedded has 275% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A500 Embedded and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A500 Embedded is a mobile workstation card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
RTX A500 Embedded
Intel Arc A310
Arc A310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 244 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.