Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 and Radeon PRO W7500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A4500
2021
20 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
56.09
+51%

RTX A4500 outperforms PRO W7500 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency19.2336.37
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 November 2021 (3 years ago)3 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71681792
Core clock speed1050 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate369.6190.4
Floating-point processing power23.65 TFLOPS12.19 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs224112
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Cores5628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm216 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1344 MHz
Memory bandwidth640.0 GB/s172.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4500 56.09
+51%
PRO W7500 37.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 21613
+51%
PRO W7500 14311

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.09 37.14
Recency 23 November 2021 3 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A4500 has a 51% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500
AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 194 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.