Radeon RX 6850M XT vs RTX A4500 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Mobile and Radeon RX 6850M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
45.55
+1.2%

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms RX 6850M XT by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58882560
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2463 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt (80 - 140 Watt TGP)145 Watt
Texture fill rate223.6413.0
Floating-point performance14.31 gflops13.21 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4500 Mobile 45.55
+1.2%
RX 6850M XT 45.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 Mobile 17570
+1.2%
RX 6850M XT 17361

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
−1.5%
132
+1.5%
1440p80−85
−2.5%
82
+2.5%
4K60−65
+0%
60
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7900%
160
+7900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6700%
136
+6700%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4100%
160−170
+4100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−382%
130−140
+382%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5200%
106
+5200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6375%
259
+6375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−922%
90−95
+922%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−382%
130−140
+382%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4250%
87
+4250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5575%
227
+5575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1256%
122
+1256%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−196%
83
+196%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 55
Hitman 3 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4850%
95−100
+4850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3750%
75−80
+3750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 47

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 159
+0%
159
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130
+0%
130
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+0%
85
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+0%
166
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 92
+0%
92
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how RTX A4500 Mobile and RX 6850M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6850M XT is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6850M XT is 3% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6850M XT is 7900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6850M XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.55 45.01
Recency 30 March 2022 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 145 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 3.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6850M XT, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX A4500 Mobile and Radeon RX 6850M XT.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Radeon RX 6850M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 216 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6850M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.