Apple M4 32-core GPU vs RTX A400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.33no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed727 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1762 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate42.29no data
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
Tensor Cores24no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Apple M4 32-core GPU has a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A400 and M4 32-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A400 is a workstation card while Apple M4 32-core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
Apple M4 32-core GPU
M4 32-core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 16 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate M4 32-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.