Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX A3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	172	47
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	51.13
Power efficiency	31.96	14.88
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	Navi 22
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2560
Core clock speed	600 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	1230 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.4	416.0
Floating-point processing power	10.08 TFLOPS	13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	160
Tensor Cores	128	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	32	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.46

RX 6750 XT 54.05
+66.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A3000 Mobile 12480

RX 6750 XT 20777
+66.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990

RX 6750 XT 48327
+85.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A3000 Mobile 71308

RX 6750 XT 104004
+45.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710

RX 6750 XT 37609
+90.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A3000 Mobile 29996

RX 6750 XT 170993
+470%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100 −65%	165 +65%
1440p	54 −61.1%	87 +61.1%
4K	47 −8.5%	51 +8.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.33
1440p	no data	6.31
4K	no data	10.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −159%	166 +159%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 −114%	165 +114%
Elden Ring	110−120 −77.5%	197 +77.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −25.8%	110−120 +25.8%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −103%	130 +103%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 +4.7%	64 −4.7%
Forza Horizon 4	164 −124%	368 +124%
Metro Exodus	103 −45.6%	150 +45.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Valorant	130−140 −78.5%	230−240 +78.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −25.8%	110−120 +25.8%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −70.3%	109 +70.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	55 +1.9%	54 −1.9%
Dota 2	130 −22.3%	159 +22.3%
Elden Ring	110−120 +68.2%	66 −68.2%
Far Cry 5	85 +73.5%	49 −73.5%
Fortnite	150−160 −43%	210−220 +43%
Forza Horizon 4	134 −127%	304 +127%
Grand Theft Auto V	124 −30.6%	162 +30.6%
Metro Exodus	49 −145%	120 +145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −16.8%	210−220 +16.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −56.8%	170−180 +56.8%
Valorant	130−140 −78.5%	230−240 +78.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 −0.7%	270−280 +0.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −25.8%	110−120 +25.8%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −50%	96 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −6.5%	49 +6.5%
Dota 2	132 +0.8%	131 −0.8%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −25.8%	110−120 +25.8%
Forza Horizon 4	114 −128%	260 +128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −16.8%	210−220 +16.8%
Valorant	130−140 −78.5%	230−240 +78.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	62 −71%	106 +71%
Elden Ring	60−65 −103%	126 +103%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 −71%	106 +71%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
World of Tanks	200−210 −66.5%	300−350 +66.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −34.9%	85−90 +34.9%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −90%	57 +90%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 −7.1%	30 +7.1%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −56.9%	160−170 +56.9%
Forza Horizon 4	86 −116%	186 +116%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −72.6%	126 +72.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −108%	100−110 +108%
Valorant	95−100 −109%	190−200 +109%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −3.1%	33 +3.1%
Dota 2	49 −112%	104 +112%
Elden Ring	27−30 −103%	59 +103%
Grand Theft Auto V	49 −112%	104 +112%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −80.8%	47 +80.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −84.3%	180−190 +84.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −85.7%	35−40 +85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	49 −112%	104 +112%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −88.9%	65−70 +88.9%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −90.6%	60−65 +90.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −85.7%	13 +85.7%
Dota 2	77 −31.2%	101 +31.2%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −107%	90−95 +107%
Fortnite	40−45 −109%	90−95 +109%
Forza Horizon 4	51 −94.1%	99 +94.1%
Valorant	45−50 −131%	110−120 +131%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 65% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 61% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 73% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 159% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
RX 6750 XT is ahead in 57 tests (90%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.46	54.05
Recency	12 April 2021	3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	250 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has 257.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 66.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.