GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs RTX A2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
35.52
+102%

RTX A2000 outperforms RTX 3050 4 GB by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141309
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.8936.95
Power efficiency34.7713.40
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GA107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 132% better value for money than RTX 3050 4 GB.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33282048
Core clock speed562 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8111.4
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs10464
Tensor Cores10464
Ray Tracing Cores2616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length167 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 35.52
+102%
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13682
+102%
RTX 3050 4 GB 6780

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
+109%
45−50
−109%
1440p44
+110%
21−24
−110%
4K28
+133%
12−14
−133%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.784.42
1440p10.209.48
4K16.0416.58

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.52 17.60
Recency 10 August 2021 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 90 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 101.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 578 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2592 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.