RTX A4500 Mobile vs RTX A2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A2000 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
25.71

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.5522.14
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25605888
Core clock speed893 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1358 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate108.6276.0
Floating-point processing power6.953 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs80184
Tensor Cores80184
Ray Tracing Cores2046

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.71
RTX A4500 Mobile 45.22
+75.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 Mobile 9906
RTX A4500 Mobile 17424
+75.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%
1440p42
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
4K36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 74
+3600%
2−3
−3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−72.7%
95−100
+72.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−66.7%
140−150
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−75.7%
260−270
+75.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+1363%
8−9
−1363%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+271%
27−30
−271%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 39
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−66.7%
140−150
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−75.7%
260−270
+75.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+1363%
8−9
−1363%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+271%
27−30
−271%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−75.7%
260−270
+75.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+1363%
8−9
−1363%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
+2250%
4−5
−2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+456%
9−10
−456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
+3.6%
27−30
−3.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−70.1%
250−260
+70.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Metro Exodus 49
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−74.6%
110−120
+74.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−74.8%
250−260
+74.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Hitman 3 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−75.6%
230−240
+75.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

This is how RTX A2000 Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 65% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 67% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 3600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A2000 Mobile surpassed RTX A4500 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.71 45.22
Recency 12 April 2021 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 140 Watt

RTX A2000 Mobile has 47.4% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 75.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 93 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.