GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs RTX A2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	211	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	89
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.87
Power efficiency	18.55	19.85
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	AD103
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	8448
Core clock speed	893 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1358 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	108.6	689.0
Floating-point processing power	6.953 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	96
TMUs	80	264
Tensor Cores	80	264
Ray Tracing Cores	20	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176.0 GB/s	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.71

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.53
+221%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 Mobile 9906

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31801
+221%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 74834
+314%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 54566
+315%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 165604
+174%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	79 −190%	229 +190%
1440p	42 −264%	153 +264%
4K	36 −164%	95 +164%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.49
1440p	no data	5.22
4K	no data	8.41

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

74
−211%

230−240

+211%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −200%	160−170 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 −176%	150−160 +176%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −190%	240−250 +190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −131%	120−130 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 −206%	190−200 +206%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −100%	110−120 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −200%	200−210 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −71.6%	250−260 +71.6%
Hitman 3	50−55 −148%	120−130 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −149%	290−300 +149%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −76.1%	150−160 +76.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −87.9%	120−130 +87.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −314%	350−400 +314%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −48.1%	150−160 +48.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −200%	160−170 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	39 −290%	150−160 +290%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −190%	240−250 +190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −131%	120−130 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 −220%	160−170 +220%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −100%	110−120 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −200%	200−210 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −71.6%	250−260 +71.6%
Hitman 3	50−55 −148%	120−130 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −149%	290−300 +149%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −76.1%	150−160 +76.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −87.9%	120−130 +87.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	108 −309%	442 +309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −233%	180−190 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −48.1%	150−160 +48.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −200%	160−170 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 −375%	150−160 +375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −131%	120−130 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	41 −217%	130−140 +217%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −100%	110−120 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −71.6%	250−260 +71.6%
Hitman 3	50−55 −148%	120−130 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −149%	290−300 +149%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	94 −333%	407 +333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 −320%	210 +320%
Watch Dogs: Legion	29 −397%	144 +397%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−87.9%

120−130
+87.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −239%	160−170 +239%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −187%	110−120 +187%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −267%	95−100 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 −304%	100−110 +304%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −183%	80−85 +183%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −220%	80−85 +220%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −190%	80−85 +190%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −84.4%	270−280 +84.4%
Hitman 3	30−35 −287%	120−130 +287%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −319%	220−230 +319%
Metro Exodus	49 −161%	120−130 +161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 −386%	306 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −397%	159 +397%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −67.8%	240−250 +67.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−193%

120−130
+193%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −252%	85−90 +252%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%
Hitman 3	20−22 −280%	75−80 +280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −72.5%	220−230 +72.5%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −386%	140−150 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −294%	130−140 +294%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −350%	70−75 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −393%	65−70 +393%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −247%	50−55 +247%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −369%	160−170 +369%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35 −363%	162 +363%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −527%	69 +527%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−350%

95−100
+350%

This is how RTX A2000 Mobile and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 190% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 264% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 164% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 527% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 4070 Ti SUPER surpassed RTX A2000 Mobile in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.71	82.53
Recency	12 April 2021	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	285 Watt

RTX A2000 Mobile has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 221% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.