Arc Graphics 140V vs RTX A2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 Mobile with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
25.73
+91.9%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking213383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.64no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameGA106Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608
Core clock speed893 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1358 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data
Texture fill rate108.6no data
Floating-point processing power6.953 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs80no data
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1375 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.73
+91.9%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 Mobile 9894
+91.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 5158

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058
+69%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A2000 Mobile 63738
+63.2%
Arc Graphics 140V 39055

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157
+38.6%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 Mobile 60336
+13.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX A2000 Mobile 5016
+24.2%
Arc Graphics 140V 4038

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
+97.5%
40
−97.5%
1440p43
+115%
20
−115%
4K37
+106%
18−20
−106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+6.7%
45
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+111%
35−40
−111%
Elden Ring 89
+123%
40−45
−123%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+77.3%
40−45
−77.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+29.7%
37
−29.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Forza Horizon 4 135
+73.1%
78
−73.1%
Metro Exodus 72
+94.6%
35−40
−94.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+64.7%
30−35
−64.7%
Valorant 110
+108%
50−55
−108%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+77.3%
40−45
−77.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+60%
30
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+108%
12−14
−108%
Dota 2 119
+170%
44
−170%
Elden Ring 127
+218%
40−45
−218%
Far Cry 5 88
+151%
35
−151%
Fortnite 120−130
+68.4%
75−80
−68.4%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+66.2%
65
−66.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+147%
43
−147%
Metro Exodus 53
+43.2%
35−40
−43.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+61.6%
95−100
−61.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+64.7%
30−35
−64.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+105%
40−45
−105%
Valorant 69
+30.2%
50−55
−30.2%
World of Tanks 260−270
+45%
180−190
−45%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+77.3%
40−45
−77.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+92%
25
−92%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+100%
10−11
−100%
Dota 2 129
+98.5%
65−70
−98.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+52.9%
50−55
−52.9%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+64.9%
57
−64.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+61.6%
95−100
−61.6%
Valorant 100−110
+94.3%
50−55
−94.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50
+178%
18
−178%
Elden Ring 43
+115%
20−22
−115%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+163%
18−20
−163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+94.4%
90−95
−94.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
World of Tanks 170−180
+78.9%
95−100
−78.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+96.9%
30−35
−96.9%
Metro Exodus 49
+69%
27−30
−69%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+124%
16−18
−124%
Valorant 70−75
+112%
30−35
−112%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Dota 2 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Elden Ring 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Dota 2 72
+106%
35−40
−106%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Fortnite 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Valorant 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%

This is how RTX A2000 Mobile and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 98% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 115% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 106% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 218% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A2000 Mobile surpassed Arc Graphics 140V in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.73 13.41
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm

RTX A2000 Mobile has a 91.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc Graphics 140V is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 95 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.