Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs RTX A1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking215not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency38.06no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed727 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1462 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate105.3345.0
Floating-point processing power6.737 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs72128
Tensor Cores72no data
Ray Tracing Cores1832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length163 mm204 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 165 Watt

RTX A1000 has 230% lower power consumption.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A1000 and Radeon RX 7650 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 31 vote

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A1000 or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.