Tesla V100 SXM2 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.10no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDG2-512GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40965120
Core clock speed930 MHz1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data438.4
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2022 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 9 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 44 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.