RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
59.03
+49%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.9823.61
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74243072
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz16000 MHz
Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.03
+49%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22746
+49%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15262

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 54921
+90%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 40179
+87.9%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 16308
+101%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 8095

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.03 39.61
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has 30.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 22 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.