Arc Graphics 140V vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
41.64
+213%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.82no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameno dataLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46088
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed16000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 41.64
+213%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16044
+213%
Arc Graphics 140V 5120

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411
+175%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908
+120%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612
+55.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 8351
+107%
Arc Graphics 140V 4038

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+200%
40
−200%
1440p60−65
+200%
20
−200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.64 13.29
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 213.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc Graphics 140V is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.