HD Graphics 10EU Mobile vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameAD107Haswell GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307280
Core clock speed930 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate139.78.500
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS0.136 TFLOPS
ROPs481
TMUs9610
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 29 April 2013
Chip lithography 5 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation has an age advantage of 9 years, a 340% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and HD Graphics 10EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics 10EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Intel HD Graphics 10EU Mobile
HD Graphics 10EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate HD Graphics 10EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.