Radeon PRO V710 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.69no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723456
Core clock speedno data1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 28 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 158 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 37.4% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 18 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.