RTX A400 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
39.62
+227%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A400 by a whopping 227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking111406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.6116.62
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speedno data727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.29
Floating-point processing powerno data2.706 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.62
+227%
RTX A400 12.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15264
+227%
RTX A400 4674

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.62 12.13
Recency 21 March 2023 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 226.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 130% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A400 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.