Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs RSX Reality Synthesizer

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors302 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2026.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs812
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RSX Reality Synthesizer and Iris Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RSX Reality Synthesizer is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 215 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.