GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VS
GTX 745 OEM GTX 750 GTX 750 Ti GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 760 GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 770 GTX 780 GTX 780 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with GeForce GTX 750 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
10.66
+5.1%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms GTX 750 Ti by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
GTX 750 Ti GTX 750 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking435446
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.93
Power efficiency24.4611.63
Architectureno dataMaxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Core clock speedno data1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.389 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data86.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 10.66
+5.1%
GTX 750 Ti 10.14

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6346
+18%
GTX 750 Ti 5378

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6294
+46.6%
GTX 750 Ti 4294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 34890
+11.3%
GTX 750 Ti 31349

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−42.9%
50
+42.9%
1440p17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.98
1440pno data9.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Elden Ring 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+25%
40−45
−25%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Valorant 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Dota 2 35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Elden Ring 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Fortnite 60−65
+5.1%
55−60
−5.1%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+3.8%
75−80
−3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Valorant 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
World of Tanks 150−160
+3.4%
140−150
−3.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+3.8%
75−80
−3.8%
Valorant 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Elden Ring 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 75−80
+4.1%
70−75
−4.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Elden Ring 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 43% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 6% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 27% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is ahead in 39 tests (62%)
  • GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.66 10.14
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 60 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
HD 7850 Radeon HD 7850
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GT 620M GeForce GT 620M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 960A GeForce GTX 960A
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
K2100M Quadro K2100M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 6693 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.