RTX PRO 6000 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking846not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.76no data
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data24064
Core clock speedno data2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 600 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has 8471.4% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 685 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.