GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 685 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm Adreno 685
2018
7 Watt
2.54

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 888% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking822212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.2929.15
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)6 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speedno data1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12000 MHz
Shared memory+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.54
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.09
+888%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421
+804%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−971%
75
+971%
1440p3−4
−1033%
34
+1033%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1520%
81
+1520%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1950%
80−85
+1950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1023%
140−150
+1023%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−448%
110−120
+448%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−171%
100−110
+171%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1950%
80−85
+1950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1023%
140−150
+1023%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−448%
110−120
+448%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−617%
86
+617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−171%
100−110
+171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1023%
140−150
+1023%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−448%
110−120
+448%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−533%
76
+533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−257%
50
+257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−171%
100−110
+171%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1750%
37
+1750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−781%
140−150
+781%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+0%
57
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 685 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 971% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 1033% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 25.09
Recency 6 December 2018 6 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 60 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 887.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 627 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.