GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Quadro4 750 XGL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated11
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.27
Power efficiencyno data11.91
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV25 A2GA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 February 2002 (22 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10752
Core clock speed275 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1860 MHz
Number of transistors63 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data450 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200625.0
Floating-point processing powerno data40 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs8336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount128 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed225 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX 3090 Ti has an age advantage of 19 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 750 XGL and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 750 XGL
Quadro4 750 XGL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3251 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.