RTX A2000 vs Quadro T600 Mobile

Place in the ranking	297	138
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	85.40
Power efficiency	31.96	35.43
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	GA106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	3328
Core clock speed	780 MHz	562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1410 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.96	124.8
Floating-point processing power	2.527 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	56	104
Tensor Cores	no data	104
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 18.34

RTX A2000 35.58
+94%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7077

RTX A2000 13725
+93.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 Mobile 10498

RTX A2000 19978
+90.3%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 Mobile 39112

RTX A2000 76281
+95%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 Mobile 7928

RTX A2000 14934
+88.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 Mobile 53941

RTX A2000 94407
+75%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	51 −88.2%	96 +88.2%
1440p	21−24 −110%	44 +110%
4K	14−16 −121%	31 +121%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.68
1440p	no data	10.20
4K	no data	14.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−92.3%

50−55
+92.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −89.2%	70−75 +89.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −85.2%	100−105 +85.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −92.3%	50−55 +92.3%
Far Cry 5	53 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −90.5%	200−210 +90.5%
Hitman 3	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −82.9%	150−160 +82.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −82.9%	150−160 +82.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −89.2%	70−75 +89.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −85.2%	100−105 +85.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −92.3%	50−55 +92.3%
Far Cry 5	49 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −90.5%	200−210 +90.5%
Hitman 3	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −82.9%	150−160 +82.9%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −78.6%	100−105 +78.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 −92.3%	100−105 +92.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −82.9%	150−160 +82.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −89.2%	70−75 +89.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −85.2%	100−105 +85.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −92.3%	50−55 +92.3%
Far Cry 5	45 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −90.5%	200−210 +90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −82.9%	150−160 +82.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Hitman 3	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −93.2%	170−180 +93.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −90%	190−200 +90%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Hitman 3	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −90.5%	160−170 +90.5%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%

This is how T600 Mobile and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

RTX A2000 is 88% faster in 1080p
RTX A2000 is 110% faster in 1440p
RTX A2000 is 121% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.34	35.58
Recency	12 April 2021	10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt

T600 Mobile has 75% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000, on the other hand, has a 94% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.