Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with Radeon RX 7900 XTX, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
20.72

RX 7900 XTX outperforms T2000 Mobile by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2668
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.71
Power efficiency23.6715.57
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246144
Core clock speed1575 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2498 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2959.2
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs64384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.72
RX 7900 XTX 80.62
+289%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985
RX 7900 XTX 31064
+289%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Mobile 13524
RX 7900 XTX 83322
+516%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−320%
252
+320%
1440p40−45
−328%
171
+328%
4K24−27
−338%
105
+338%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.96
1440pno data5.84
4Kno data9.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−633%
242
+633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−261%
166
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−709%
283
+709%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−259%
240−250
+259%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−600%
231
+600%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−146%
110−120
+146%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−265%
200−210
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−97.6%
250−260
+97.6%
Hitman 3 40−45
−215%
120−130
+215%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−188%
280−290
+188%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−118%
150−160
+118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−125%
120−130
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−407%
350−400
+407%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−65.6%
150−160
+65.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−617%
330
+617%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−589%
241
+589%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−259%
240−250
+259%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−530%
208
+530%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−146%
110−120
+146%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−265%
200−210
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−97.6%
250−260
+97.6%
Hitman 3 40−45
−215%
120−130
+215%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−188%
280−290
+188%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−118%
150−160
+118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−125%
120−130
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−675%
535
+675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−285%
170−180
+285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−65.6%
150−160
+65.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−191%
134
+191%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−500%
210
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−503%
199
+503%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−146%
110−120
+146%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−132%
295
+132%
Hitman 3 40−45
−215%
120−130
+215%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−310%
406
+310%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−583%
471
+583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−548%
298
+548%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−69.9%
158
+69.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−125%
120−130
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−315%
160−170
+315%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−250%
110−120
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−529%
132
+529%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−800%
171
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−257%
80−85
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1075%
141
+1075%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−134%
270−280
+134%
Hitman 3 24−27
−392%
110−120
+392%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−681%
328
+681%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−274%
146
+274%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−737%
360
+737%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−892%
238
+892%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−98.3%
240−250
+98.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−265%
120−130
+265%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−340%
85−90
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−331%
65−70
+331%
Hitman 3 16−18
−356%
70−75
+356%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−111%
220−230
+111%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−518%
130−140
+518%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−767%
182
+767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−817%
110
+817%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−873%
107
+873%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−373%
50−55
+373%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−711%
227
+711%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−721%
197
+721%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−1044%
103
+1044%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is 320% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 328% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 338% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 1675% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900 XTX surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.72 80.62
Recency 27 May 2019 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 355 Watt

T2000 Mobile has 491.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 289.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 394 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3673 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.