GeForce RTX 3080 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 3080, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
17.87

RTX 3080 outperforms T2000 Mobile by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.11
Power efficiency23.6413.97
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248704
Core clock speed1575 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2465.1
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.58.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T2000 Mobile 17.87
RTX 3080 56.31
+215%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985
RTX 3080 25160
+215%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Mobile 13524
RTX 3080 53713
+297%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−226%
163
+226%
1440p35−40
−249%
122
+249%
4K24−27
−254%
85
+254%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.29
1440pno data5.73
4Kno data8.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−171%
300−350
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−268%
150−160
+268%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−115%
172
+115%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−171%
300−350
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−237%
138
+237%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−138%
157
+138%
Fortnite 100−110
−180%
280−290
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−199%
230−240
+199%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−145%
152
+145%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−246%
135
+246%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−139%
170−180
+139%
Valorant 140−150
−131%
300−350
+131%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−95%
156
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−171%
300−350
+171%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−19.8%
270−280
+19.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−227%
134
+227%
Dota 2 100−110
−34.9%
147
+34.9%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−127%
150
+127%
Fortnite 100−110
−180%
280−290
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−199%
230−240
+199%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−126%
140
+126%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−101%
147
+101%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−215%
123
+215%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−205%
128
+205%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−139%
170−180
+139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−441%
303
+441%
Valorant 140−150
−131%
300−350
+131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−81.3%
145
+81.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−220%
131
+220%
Dota 2 100−110
−23.9%
135
+23.9%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−112%
140
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−199%
230−240
+199%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−159%
101
+159%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−139%
170−180
+139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−166%
149
+166%
Valorant 140−150
−84.8%
268
+84.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−180%
280−290
+180%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−341%
180−190
+341%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−224%
450−500
+224%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−229%
112
+229%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−280%
95
+280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.3%
170−180
+2.3%
Valorant 180−190
−117%
350−400
+117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−125%
124
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−378%
86
+378%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−207%
135
+207%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−308%
200−210
+308%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−282%
84
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−325%
130−140
+325%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−236%
150−160
+236%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−350%
80−85
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−309%
143
+309%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−215%
40−45
+215%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−306%
65
+306%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−297%
115
+297%
Valorant 110−120
−194%
300−350
+194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−214%
91
+214%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−350%
80−85
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−438%
43
+438%
Dota 2 65−70
−92.5%
129
+92.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−348%
94
+348%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−277%
49
+277%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−405%
95−100
+405%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
−295%
75−80
+295%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 226% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 249% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 254% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3080 is 441% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3080 surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.87 56.31
Recency 27 May 2019 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 320 Watt

T2000 Mobile has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080, on the other hand, has a 215.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 456 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6638 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T2000 Mobile or GeForce RTX 3080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.