RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with RTX 4500 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
16.70

RTX 4500 Ada Generation outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency73.7523.97
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247680
Core clock speed855 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20619.2
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs64240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−262%
210−220
+262%
1440p33
−264%
120−130
+264%
4K81
−270%
300−350
+270%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Battlefield 5 75−80
−268%
280−290
+268%
Far Cry 5 65
−269%
240−250
+269%
Fortnite 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−273%
280−290
+273%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−262%
210−220
+262%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−268%
250−260
+268%
Valorant 130−140
−262%
500−550
+262%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−268%
280−290
+268%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−257%
800−850
+257%
Dota 2 114
−251%
400−450
+251%
Far Cry 5 59
−273%
220−230
+273%
Fortnite 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−273%
280−290
+273%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−262%
210−220
+262%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−266%
260−270
+266%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−268%
250−260
+268%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−266%
260−270
+266%
Valorant 130−140
−262%
500−550
+262%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−268%
280−290
+268%
Dota 2 107
−274%
400−450
+274%
Far Cry 5 56
−275%
210−220
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−273%
280−290
+273%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−268%
250−260
+268%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−278%
140−150
+278%
Fortnite 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−279%
500−550
+279%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−278%
140−150
+278%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Valorant 170−180
−274%
650−700
+274%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−265%
190−200
+265%
Far Cry 5 41
−266%
150−160
+266%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%
Fortnite 40−45
−257%
150−160
+257%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Valorant 100−110
−240%
350−400
+240%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Dota 2 109
−267%
400−450
+267%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Fortnite 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX 4500 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 262% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 264% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 270% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.70 63.32
Recency 12 April 2021 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 210 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 279.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
21 vote

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.