Arc Pro A30M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile and Arc Pro A30M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.42
+27.8%

T1200 Mobile outperforms Arc Pro A30M by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking284345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency74.6421.04
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed855 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20128.0
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
1440p33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
4K81
+35%
60−65
−35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+30%
50−55
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 65
+30%
50−55
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+30%
50−55
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+30%
50−55
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 56
+40%
40−45
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+37%
27−30
−37%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+30.6%
85−90
−30.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 35% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.42 15.19
Recency 12 April 2021 8 August 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 27.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A30M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 135 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.