RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Quadro T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.22no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117AD104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed1395 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data386.3
Floating-point processing powerno data24.72 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 110 Watt

Quadro T1000 has 120% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T1000 and RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation card while RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 371 vote

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.