RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Mobile with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
16.95

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms T1000 Mobile by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31829
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.6434.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686144
Core clock speed1395 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate69.84417.6
Floating-point processing power2.235 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.95
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.22
+279%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Mobile 6540
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24773
+279%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
−277%
230−240
+277%
4K48
−275%
180−190
+275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−275%
180−190
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
−277%
200−210
+277%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Far Cry 5 49
−267%
180−190
+267%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%
Forza Horizon 4 119
−278%
450−500
+278%
Hitman 3 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Metro Exodus 83
−261%
300−310
+261%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
−273%
250−260
+273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−268%
140−150
+268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−262%
170−180
+262%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Far Cry 5 41
−266%
150−160
+266%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%
Forza Horizon 4 114
−251%
400−450
+251%
Hitman 3 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Metro Exodus 63
−265%
230−240
+265%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
−265%
190−200
+265%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−245%
100−105
+245%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Far Cry 5 31
−255%
110−120
+255%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−270%
400−450
+270%
Hitman 3 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−271%
130−140
+271%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
−260%
180−190
+260%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−230%
300−310
+230%
Hitman 3 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−243%
350−400
+243%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Hitman 3 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−249%
300−310
+249%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%

This is how T1000 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 277% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 275% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.95 64.22
Recency 27 May 2019 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 130 Watt

T1000 Mobile has 160% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 278.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 153 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.