Radeon RX 7900M vs Quadro RTX 8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-8 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 8000
VS
Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with Radeon RX 7900M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
50.03

RX 7900M outperforms RTX 8000 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 8000 RTX 8000
RX 7900M RX 7900M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Power efficiency13.1922.69
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084608
Core clock speed1395 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8601.9
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs288288
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores7272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 50.03
RX 7900M 59.57
+19.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19278
RX 7900M 22956
+19.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
−19.3%
167
+19.3%
1440p100−110
−20%
120
+20%
4K80−85
−23.8%
99
+23.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p71.42no data
1440p99.99no data
4K124.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 344
+0%
344
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+0%
168
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 249
+0%
249
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hitman 3 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+0%
116
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 131
+0%
131
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how RTX 8000 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 19% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 24% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 50.03 59.57
Recency 13 August 2018 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 180 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 19.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
RX 7900M Radeon RX 7900M
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
L40S L40S
Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
P102-101 P102 101
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GTX 480 512 GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
vs
Jetson TX2 GPU Jetson TX2 GPU
RTX 2080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
vs
RTX 3070 6144SP GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP
R5 A240 Radeon R5 A240
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
M5000 SE Quadro M5000 SE
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 6000 Mobile Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
vs
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
9100M G mGPU GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
vs
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 58 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.