GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro RTX 8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 8000 Tesla T10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
50.22
+119%

RTX 8000 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 8000 RTX 8000
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9769.15
Power efficiency13.3026.31
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 3410% better value for money than RTX 8000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081536
Core clock speed1395 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8128.2
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs28896
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 50.22
+119%
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19305
+119%
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+118%
78
−118%
4K70−75
+106%
34
−106%

Cost per frame, $

1080p58.82
−1903%
2.94
+1903%
4K142.84
−2021%
6.74
+2021%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 1903% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 2021% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Elden Ring 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 81
+0%
81
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 102
+0%
102
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Elden Ring 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 172
+0%
172
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 63
+0%
63
+0%
World of Tanks 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Elden Ring 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
World of Tanks 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Elden Ring 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how RTX 8000 and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 118% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 8000 is 106% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 50.22 22.93
Recency 13 August 2018 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 119% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
L40S L40S
ATI HD 5950 Radeon HD 5950
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
RTX 2080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
RTX 2060 RTX 2060
vs
RTX 3070 TiM 3070 TiM
R5 A320 Radeon R5 A320
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
Quadro 4100 Quadro 4100
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1660 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
Iris Pro Graphics P555 Iris Pro Graphics P555
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 558 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.