GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
41.58
+67.3%

RTX 6000 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.37100.00
Power efficiency12.6924.65
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1470% better value for money than RTX 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081536
Core clock speed1440 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8152.6
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs28896
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+59.1%
88
−59.1%
1440p95−100
+63.8%
58
−63.8%
4K55−60
+57.1%
35
−57.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p44.99
−1629%
2.60
+1629%
1440p66.31
−1579%
3.95
+1579%
4K114.53
−1650%
6.54
+1650%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1629% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1579% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1650% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+0%
109
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+0%
81
+0%
Battlefield 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+0%
133
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 209
+0%
209
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 207
+0%
207
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+0%
109
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+0%
107
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 197
+0%
197
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 152
+0%
152
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RTX 6000 and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 59% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 64% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 is 57% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.58 24.86
Recency 13 August 2018 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 67.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 225% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1636 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.