Radeon PRO W7500 vs Quadro RTX 5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon PRO W7500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5000
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
41.46
+11.6%

RTX 5000 outperforms PRO W7500 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.33100.00
Power efficiency12.3636.37
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)3 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 $429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 598% better value for money than RTX 5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721792
Core clock speed1620 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5190.4
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS12.19 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs192112
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores4828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm216 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1344 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s172.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 41.46
+11.6%
PRO W7500 37.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 15975
+11.6%
PRO W7500 14311

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.46 37.14
Recency 13 August 2018 3 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 5000 has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 204 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.